This is also true in the other video based things like news, major events etc of all kinds. You can even watch in the plant shows the "how it's made" which I'm not a fan of but shows that they construct "stages" for plants to be filmed in slow motion for weeks even years then presented as a "natural" scene etc lots of tricks these people play. Examples would be the sandstorm sequences and flooding sequences as well as even in Planet Earth 1 and Blue Planet 1 they use CGI to "enhance" the scenes with so called dozens of whales and birds, you can easily see the multiple "blowholes" all over the place etc that is not real.
#Stream blue planet 2 episode 7 series
The one thing I would recommend is avoiding the newer series like Africa, Blue Planet 2, Planet Earth 2 etc as they use CGI effects for a so called "nature" show of "observation". Really great series, I grew up watching the older series like Life on Earth and Living Planet so they are actually relaxing to me. This is definitely a very good collection and Ive ejnoyed watching it.
I just want to watch a nature documentary. I can, however say that StinkyTaco is annoying and tell he or she to take that that annoying BS somewhere else where people want to debate with you. I dont know much about what else the BBC does besides David Attenborough's Docs, so, I can't argue about other things. As the desert grew, they were forced farther and farther north. Macaques dont usually live on savannahs, so they must have come from a forest that was once where the Sahara is now. So, there must have been something else there in the past. Could they have crossed the Sahara? No, they need water. Where did they come from? South, because north of nothern Africa is Europe and no macaques or really any monkeys live there. The context of that being said was that Macaques were in forests in Northern Africa. Just do some research or use common sense. And about the sahara being forest at one time. And now, he's trying to make people more aware. He's said in interviews that he didnt believe Humans had anything to do with it or that it was a problem until became undeniable to him. Pre-2010 he never brought up the subject of Climate Change/Global Warming and Humanaty's role in it. I know everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but why is that opinion needed here? David Attenborough, "The Narrator" is world renowned and one of, if not the best Natural History Documentarian ever. While I do agree about that cgi should not be used in nature docs, review was ridiculous lol.
0 kommentar(er)
